
Reviewing an LLM draft isn’t the same as editing a human draft. Human writers make errors you can see, like typos and awkward phrasing. Models make errors you can’t see: fluent sentences built on wrong facts. A checklist makes the review consistent across editors and catches the failures that skimming misses.
Copy the checklist below into your review template, PR description, or CMS workflow. Work through it in order. The early steps catch the errors that would make later steps pointless.
The checklist
text
AI CONTENT AUDIT CHECKLISTDocument: ____________ Reviewer: ____________ Date: ________[ ] 1. SOURCE CHECK – Confirm which inputs the draft was generated from (spec, release notes, ticket). Flag any claim with no traceable source.[ ] 2. VERSION CHECK – Confirm the content matches the current product version. Check feature names, UI labels, and deprecations.[ ] 3. PARAMETER CHECK – Verify every field, flag, parameter, default value, and limit against the spec or source code.[ ] 4. CODE CHECK – Run every code sample, CLI command, and API request in a clean, current environment. Record the result.[ ] 5. RESPONSE CHECK – Compare documented responses, status codes, and error messages with real output.[ ] 6. EDGE-CASE CHECK – Confirm the draft covers errors, limits, permissions, and empty or invalid inputs where relevant.[ ] 7. LINK CHECK – Test every internal and external link. Confirm that cross-references point to the right topic.[ ] 8. TERMINOLOGY CHECK – Match product names and UI terms to the glossary and style guide.[ ] 9. STYLE CHECK – Run the prose linter. Fix voice, tense, and sentence-length issues and anything off-template.[ ] 10. SME SIGN-OFF – Get a subject matter expert to confirm technical accuracy. Record their name and the date.Unresolved items: _______________________________________Approved for publication: [ ] Yes [ ] No
Why this order
Steps 1 through 3 confirm the draft is about the right thing. If a draft describes the wrong version, polishing its prose wastes time. Steps 4 through 6 test whether the content actually works. Steps 7 through 9 handle consistency and style, which tools can partly automate. Step 10 makes someone accountable for accuracy, which a model can’t be.
Making it stick
- Keep evidence. A checked box without a recorded result is a guess. For steps 4 and 5, paste the command output or a link to the test run.
- Don’t skip steps for short content. A two-line note with a wrong default value does as much damage as a wrong tutorial.
- Track what fails. If step 3 keeps catching invented parameters, give the model better source material, not more editing time.
A checklist doesn’t make review slower. It moves review effort to the places where AI drafts actually break.
Need a review process your editors can apply consistently to every AI draft?
We help teams design audit checklists and review workflows that make AI-generated content accurate, testable, and ready to publish.
📩 Start here: services@ai-technical-writing.com
Leave a Reply